Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> only negative real-life effects

Almost. It hardly worked as intended, but at least it increased awareness. The fact that some sites tried to comply and actually provided a full list of all sites that they sell your private data to is somewhat a win. It got to a lot of wider public that realized "they sell it to 97 companies?!".

I personally think local governments or EU wide institutions should have a registry of companies and their sites with ratings, so we could integrate that directly in our browsers, company registries, phone dialer apps. iFixIt style.

- Clarity of EULA: 1/10, impossible to understand without lawyer's interpretation.

- Length of EULA: 1/10, pops up every week with no diff or summary of changes

- Legality: 4/10, historical track record of rules that are not compliant with local laws of xxx

- History: 1/10, no way to track what were the previous versions of the document or when they changed

- ...

EDIT: to give some context and prove it's possible to provide metrics to legal documents, in Poland we have a formal "Registry of Forbidden Clauses" with references to lost court cases:

https://www.rejestr.uokik.gov.pl/



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: