Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Except Google is taking down any illegal data they are asked to takedown or to give to law enforcement.

Durov is not arrested to have hosted illegal content but to deliberately have not do anything against it when asked to.

If you did something illegal via Gmail and the law enforcement asked for your mails to Google, they’d give them. Telegram voluntarily did not.

Note that Durov/Telegram could have been easily protected against this by using E2E encryption and therefore not becoming the owner of the data on their servers.



> Note that Durov/Telegram could have been easily protected against this by using E2E encryption and therefore not becoming the owner of the data on their servers.

How'd that work for Lavabit?


No they stay up for weeks after dozens of reports. I suspect the ads are only taken off once the stolen credit card used in AdWords gets declined.


Same is true for whoever checks Ads for Facebook. Funnily enough telegram is way more restrictive with it's own ads.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: