Not really familiar with this space but I think the entire Dojo/DIY strategy was...

charleshn · on Aug 28, 2024

Indeed, it seems that 80usec is just given as an upper bound based on the 1MB buffer at 100Gbps.

It is definitely possible to go much lower than 80usec on Ethernet. But obviously it depends on the scale, utilisation etc.

At the sizes of GPU clusters we're talking about these days - 32K and up - things get tricky.

The main alternative to Infiniband used in the industry is RoCE - Meta has written a lot about it [0].

There's several reasons to avoid Infiniband, such as cost, availability, vendor lock in, lack of experience etc.

Those are some of the reasons why many players are trying hard to make Ethernet work, see Ultra Ethernet [1].

foobiekr · on Aug 28, 2024

It’s not even rare for Ethernet to be 1.5usec or less latency per switch. 80usec would be impossible to sell in any compute cluster.

throw0101d · on Aug 28, 2024

> It’s not even rare for Ethernet to be 1.5usec or less latency per switch.

IIRC, Arista started off focusing on the financial market with low latency.

There's fairly well regarded in a general sense nowadays (at least /r/networking often has folks recommending them as a vendor).

"Measuring the latency of a 4ns switch":

KaiserPro · on Aug 28, 2024

RoCE is close enough, I think is how meta justifies it.

justahuman74 · on Aug 28, 2024

Is RoCE no good?

publicmail · on Aug 28, 2024

The problem is that it kind of relies on a lossless layer 2 (flow control) which has its own set of problems in large scale networks. This is what things like this try to solve: https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/systems/introducing-fal...