Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

In almost all mergers the management of the worse comapny ends up winning, provided there was no loopsided difference in size. The thing is, since those executive were not good at creating product, they are more likely to be good at politics and hence they end up overtaking management of the new combined company, even if their company was the smaller one.



They should have fired the failing company's management after the merger. It failed due to the fact that they were incompetent.


I’m curious to know of similar examples happening or references that back this up if you or anyone has them.


A good series of examples is in the book "Barbarians at the Gate", chronicling the career of F Ross Johnson. His company would get acquired and then he and his folks would outmanoeuvre the acquiring company management.


NeXt leadership completely overtook Apple. I don't know if it ended up panning out.


US Air buying American Airlines just to become American Airlines, is one of my (least) favorites


I enjoyed Lights Out: Pride, Delusion, and the Fall of General Electric by Ted Mann and Thomas Gryta


Worse-is-better, it’s not just for operating systems. Or maybe management is just another operating system.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: