That an interpretation. The other interpretation is "Hey I'm not a talented artist. This tool allows me to express an idea I couldn't otherwise." Yes AI art is used in scams, and AI doesn't give you good taste. By I don't think it indicates laziness.
I cringe when I see one, but sometimes the articles are good. Apparently, some people have great writing skills but suck at visual taste. Though, arguably, they aught to know that about themselves.
Is that a little like cutting off one's nose to spite one's face? Good to have principles that propel forwards and not become entrenched by them, wouldn't you agree? That said, you will save, or at least not waste, an awful lot of time - there was already too much and now a lot more tripe out there since so-called a.i..
> Good to have principles that propel forwards and not become entrenched by them, wouldn't you agree? That said, you will save, or at least not waste, an awful lot of time - there was already too much and now a lot more tripe out there since so-called a.i..
In this case, it's not really entrenchment, because there are viable alternatives.
It screams "I rushed this out, I'm probably regurgitating something I just learned".
I rather a dorky stock photo than some nonsense AI image puking out some combination of "cyber", "tech", "hacker", and "circuit".
It's unserious at best, scammy at its worst.