I don't read his substack, so most of what I see of him is what gets passed on social media, which is definitely in this vein (even if it is perhaps a collection of the worst of Nate Silver).
It's also worth noting that you making your comment on a thread about an article by Nate Silver on why people like him are great that makes almost no reference to statistical modelling and is instead heavy on some sociopolitical views are better than others, which is exactly the kind of writing that has caused many people to sour on him.
The question was why do so many people dislike Nate Silver. He claims - correctly - that lots of people are exposed to Nate Silver's very dumb commentary on politics. Whether that's a "representative sample of his work" is irrelevant to the question if it's what people are exposed to.
