Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

We expect different things from the OS we use, I guess.

My main machine is a Macbook Pro and one thing that annoys me a lot is the way Apple handles apps that are not notarized. I don't use iPhones because of the system restrictions (file access, background running, etc) and because I can only install what Apple allows on their store. You can see why I don't want Microsoft to hold my hand when I use Windows... it's my machine, I paid for it, I should be able to install crapware and extend the system functionality if that's what I want especially when I pick an OS that allows me to do that.

In this case, enterprise customers decided to use an OS that allows them to also use CrowdStrike. Maybe Microsoft could handle this stuff better and not show a BSOD? I guess so, but I won't blame them for allowing these tools to exist.

Don't get me wrong, there's a place for very restrictive operating systems like iOS or ChromeOS, but they're not for everyone or enough for all tasks. Windows is a very capable OS, certainly not the best option for everyone, but the day Microsoft cripples Windows like that, it's the day I am forced to stop using it.



> be Microsoft could handle this stuff better and not show a BSOD?

How would the OS differentiate between a compromised agent and a faulty one ?. Do you want the OS to continue boot when it is potentially compromised ? That is likely to cause a lot more damage than yesterday did.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: