Does anyone know any good FOSS projects that were actually funded by this?
I feel like the people deciding what (research and technology) to fund in the EU generally have very poor taste in their selections. I assume that they are non-technical as they often seem to choose the projects that make the most ambitious claims about social impact and EU values, but have very little to none technical merit.
Stuff like Rust, that could be a real technological advantage for the EU, is not funded, but weird blockchain semantic web foo is https://www.ngi.eu/
NGI funded us to work on the GNU Name System (https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9498.html), that includes the Go implementation, updates to the C implementation, and the specification. Plus NGI funds work on https://taler.net/. Another example for a project they funded is https://cryptpad.fr/. https://nlnet.nl/project/ has an extensive list. If you actually care about privacy on the Internet and FLOSS, I'd be surprised if you did not find some project there that you know or use.
If you are working on improving privacy on the Internet with FLOSS, you can still apply for funding at https://nlnet.nl/propose.
One project that was funded that I can remember is https://stalw.art. It’s a very nice and compact e-mail server. The EU doesn’t take decisions directly about which projects to fund, but instead delegates it to more knowledgeable organizations. One such org is https://www.nlnetlabs.nl
I think the core of the question here is - do those funds bring any kind of return or are they one of thefriends of friends get handouts from government type projects that ultimately don't generate anything outside corruption and paperwork.
> The EU doesn’t take decisions directly about which projects to fund, but instead delegates it to more knowledgeable organizations.
They very much do. They invite volunteers to review applications and serve on juries for EIC and ERC, but the entire process, including definition of the funding criteria, is run by the EU.
EU SME funding programs have "non bankability" as a criterion (or variations on that, it changes every few years).
What that means is that if you have alternative sources of funding, even just potentially, you are disqualified.
What they're trying to do is 1) avoid competing with private funding and 2) fill in the gap where private funding is too risk averse but the project has huge potential.
In practice the result is as you say, this is basically a criterion to bias the selection to bad projects.
A few projects were funded multiple times for different features, but I've not necessarily used the particular feature that received funding, so let's say 2% of grants benefited me in some way. I suspect that's a different 2% for most people.
It doesn't look like they're averse to funding Rust projects (none of which I've used, like HN favorite Servo), so unless the Rust Foundation applied for a grant and was rejected, I don't think you can criticize NLnet for not funding them.
I periodically watch the status of Lanzaboote [1] to know when it will be upstreamed to Nixpkgs so that it will be easier for people (e.g. me) to switch to NixOS. It has been funded by the Next Generation Internet initiative that the article says is being eliminated.
I don’t know why they said that. But I guess it’s the difference between a low certainty and a high certainty bet.
In 2024 it’s a safe assumption that a lot of the digital infra we use in 10 years will be based on Rust, so it may make sense to fund that.
On the other hand, something speculative like “semantic web” is less likely to be as important. It could be important, we just don’t know in $current_year.
I think it’s alright to split money between low certainty and high certainty bets, but reasonable people can disagree.
I feel like the people deciding what (research and technology) to fund in the EU generally have very poor taste in their selections. I assume that they are non-technical as they often seem to choose the projects that make the most ambitious claims about social impact and EU values, but have very little to none technical merit.
Stuff like Rust, that could be a real technological advantage for the EU, is not funded, but weird blockchain semantic web foo is https://www.ngi.eu/