Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

[flagged]


They don't need to be regulated, they need to be forcefully taken into public ownership. Utilities shouldn't be privatised, and neither should public transport for that matter. All these companies do is siphon off profits to shareholders without re-investing and maintaining the infrastructure as they should.


In a hurricane, 90% of the damage is in distribution, the only thing that fixes it are boots on the ground


The mayors of Houston for the past few decades have been Democrats.


Does the mayor have any influence whatsoever over Centerpoint, the private company given a monopoly by the state government which has been run by Republicans for god knows how long?


Houston city government is largely comprised on Democrats and has been for some time.

Also, California has dealt with issues related to electric reliability and is by no means a conservative state.


Who gave Centerpoint the monopoly? Who holds center point accountable? Houston Mayor? Nope.

State government. Republicans.

That you for making an excellent point.


Who gave PG&E the monopoly in CA?


PG&E could not be more different.

Thank you for making my point so succinctly.


I'm struggling to come up with a Democrat run city that demonstrates they govern better than anyone else.

Chicago? New York? San Fransisco? Baltimore?


I’m struggling to come up with republican run cities in general. Mesa, Jacksonville, Colorado Springs, Fairbanks? Any other ones?


Take any metric you like: child mortality, educational outcomes, hunger, per capita income, media income, purchasing power parity, you name it.

Compare those cities to traditionally Republican run states.

Try it.

There is a very very good reason why the best and brightest leave rural republican areas and move to the big cities: it is better in almost every way we measure human wellbeing.


You cannot compare states to cities.

>Compare those cities to traditionally Republican run states

The South was traditionally ran by the Democratic Party.


Ok, try Republican run cities, if you can find them.

Also, compare net federal tax inputs vs outputs for states. Blue states pay for Red states. Massively.

Are you serious about the Dixiecrats? Really? Go read about Lee Atwater and the Southern Strategy. Find out what “States Rights” really means.

Direct recording of Lee Atwater on the southern strategy: https://www.thenation.com/article/archive/exclusive-lee-atwa...


>Are you serious about the Dixiecrats? Really?

This is what happens when the only "history" you consume is from reddit comments. I'm embarrassed for you. This is top-tier /r/confidentlyincorrect cringe. No, not the Dixiecrats, the Democratic Party. From your GP above: "... traditionally Republican run states."

The South was not "traditionally Republican run", it was solidly Democratic: "The Solid South was the electoral voting bloc for the Democratic Party in the Southern United States between the end of the Reconstruction era in 1877 and the Civil Rights Act of 1964."[0] Traditionally the "Red" states you opine about were a staunch voting bloc for the Democratic Party.

QED.

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solid_South


Not surprised I didn't get a response. Facts are racist, and reality is fascist.


[flagged]





Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: