There are various levels to code reviews. Code review tools that are web based are pretty poor in my experience. Anything more than a few lines across multiple files needs a cscope type tool.
Also what type of review? Is this a prototype needing a high level design review so that the actual review doesn’t turn into a design review? How often does that occur?
Who are the reviewers and what’s the process? Key stakeholders have more influence and you need to consider the reviewer’s experience, knowledge and credibility.
Finally how important is the code? Is it kernel code, or high execution daemon code needing race condition and memory leak checking? Are you using static analysis for the code? Does the code even compile and do what it is designed to do? Where are the unit test logs?
Also what type of review? Is this a prototype needing a high level design review so that the actual review doesn’t turn into a design review? How often does that occur?
Who are the reviewers and what’s the process? Key stakeholders have more influence and you need to consider the reviewer’s experience, knowledge and credibility.
Finally how important is the code? Is it kernel code, or high execution daemon code needing race condition and memory leak checking? Are you using static analysis for the code? Does the code even compile and do what it is designed to do? Where are the unit test logs?
Lots to consider.