Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Again, another claim that a brain or AGI is required to drive a car. Does anyone have any research to cite that establishes this seemingly known fact?


I am not sure that the vision in Teslas is adequate with -any- amount of processing to drive a car. Spatial resolution is limited, as is seeing distant vehicles during merges, etc.

Secondarily, there is no guarantee that the amount of processing is enough, because the extant human systems use much more.

“Cheating” by using more sensors to simplify out complexities and to cover for the shortcomings of other sensors in the suite seems wise.


> “Cheating” by using more sensors to simplify out complexities and to cover for the shortcomings of other sensors in the suite seems wise.

Also, "cheating" is just a necessary step to build baseline metrics. You need ground truth.

It may very well be the case that cheating is needed to generate the training data necessary to stop cheating...someday.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: