Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I really don't understand why they aren't transparent about this, but judging by the downvotes I'm getting it seems people really, really want to believe they are intelligent and independent self-driving machines. It's so much more futuristic with a "wow" factor that attracts press attention and future investement.


The downvotes are because your suspicions are entirely wrong. There’s no remote “driving” or “take over”. They wrote a blog post on how it works just a few weeks ago: https://waymo.com/blog/2024/05/fleet-response/


So I've learned but it's not reassuring because the safer option would be to give a remote operator the ability to take over


That would be the least safe option due to network latencies involved.


Drone operators in Ukraine seem to do fine and besides, I'm talking about having the option, not using it 100% of the time


Surely, it's obvious that Waymo operates in a different safety critical setting? It's a 5000 pound vehicle with pedestrians and other vehicles around it. You can't depend on a network connection to prevent injuries and deaths.


Alphabet has way more money to spend on it than Ukrainians. I was a professional driver in a couple of jobs and as far as I can tell Google Waymo doesn't care about the millions of Americans they want to put out of work, possibly by having cheap foreign labor drive their cars, so you see I can't let it go that easily




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: