Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Yeah, people - in general - tend to do this with anything novel, sadly - especially novel design. See what Steve Balmer said about the iPhone for a commercial example. For Engineering examples, well, see the controversy around anything by Poettering (Systemd, PulseAudio, etc., etc.).


> For Engineering examples, well, see the controversy around anything by Poettering (Systemd, PulseAudio, etc., etc.).

I love how you can’t get any sense out of them.

“So, you can see that software Y is almost unmaintainable in practice due to no maintainers wanting to work on ancient codebases?”

Yes.

“And you won’t maintain them?”

Yes.

“And you will not pay someone to maintain them for you?”

Yes.

“But you will staunchly fight the suitable FOSS alternative?”

Yes.

“Even if it means a constant relative decline in performance and options, not to mention evermore terrible workarounds?”

Yes.

Makes my head spin.


Multiple alternative to systemd are actively maintained.


I think it is sort of different, though, Balmer was motivated to minimize the iPhone because they were his competition. It is an attempt to manipulate people. This odd thing where commenters online are never impressed by any tech thing, I’m not sure what the motivation is. They don’t even get a reputation for being so clever and jaded, because they are mostly pseudonymous.


>what Steve Balmer said about the iPhone

The first iPhone, running iOS v1, was kinda shit. It's easy to look at what the iPhone is today and laugh at Ballmer, but I don't think what he said was wrong at the time he said it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eywi0h_Y5_U




Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: