Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

/? fednow API: https://www.google.com/search?q=fednow+api [...]

- From https://explore.fednow.org/resources?id=67#_Who_should_downl... :

> Who should download the FedNow ISO 20022 message specifications and how can I access them?

> The Federal Reserve is using the MyStandards® platform to provide access to the FedNow ISO 20022 message specifications and accompanying implementation guide. You can access these on the Federal Reserve Financial Services portal (Off-site) under the FedNow Service. Users need a MyStandards account, which you can create on the SWIFT website (Off-site). View our step-by-step guide (PDF, Off-site) for tips on accessing the specifications.

FedNow charges a $0.045/tx fee. (edit: And a waived $25/mo fee [...] https://explore.fednow.org/explore-the-city?id=3&building=&p... )

From "X starts experimenting with a $1 per year fee for new users" https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37933366 ... From "Anatomy of an ACH transaction" (2023) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36503888 :

> The WebMonetization spec [4] and docs [5] specifies the `monetization` <meta> tag for indicating where supporting browsers can send payments and micropayments:

  <meta
   name="monetization" content="$wallet.example.com/alice">
And from "Paying Netflix $0.53/H, etc." https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38685348 :

> W3C Web Monetization does micropayments with a <$0.01/tx fee, but not KYC or AML.

> [Web Monetization] is an open spec: https://webmonetization.org/specification/

Built on W3C Interledger: https://interledger.org/interledger :

> Built on modern technologies, Interledger can handle up to 1 million transactions per second per participant

> ILP is not tied to a single company, payment network, or currency.

Interledger > Peering, Clearing and Settling: https://interledger.org/developers/rfcs/peering-clearing-set...

Can FedNow handle micropayments volumes? > Micropayments: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micropayment

Does FedNow integrate with Interledger; i.e. is there support for "ILP Addresses"?



Some of these sentences seem sort of related. You're just linking to Google searches and providing random snippets from linked sites. Overall this comment and many of the comments in your history look like spam.


Compared to aigen with citations found for whatever was generated without consideration for truth and ethical reasoning?

The heuristics should be improved, then; we shouldn't ask me to put these in PDFs without typed edges to URLs and schema.org/Datasets, to support a schema.org/Claim or a ClaimReview in a SocialMediaPosting about a NewsArticle about a ScholarlyArticle :about a Thing skos:Concept with a :url.

Would you have deep linked your way to those resources (which are useful enough to be re-cited here for later reference) without the researcher doing it for you?

Technical writing courses for example advise to include the searches that you used in the databases that you found oracles in, in order to help indicate the background research bias prior to the hypothesis at least.

Transparency and Accountability: https://westurner.github.io/hnlog/

So, this sort of cited input is valuable and should be valued not as link spam but as linked edge-dense research sans generatble prose.


> Technical writing courses for example advise to include the searches that you used in the databases that you found oracles in, in order to help indicate the background research bias prior to the hypothesis at least.

I'm not writing a doctoral thesis. These comments are not my livelihood. I'm just sharing industry knowledge on a topic I know about.

Your random links without context, some of the links to literal Google searches, are not in any way useful or interesting.


I haven't asked you to do anything.

Thanks for your time


It's the style of comments you get on a lot of conspiracy sites. I see comment styles like that on a lot of articles linked from places like rense.com.


No, these are all hand prepared.

This is called research, and it does require citations.

Please do not harass overachievers who do the research work instead of just talking to talk.

#areyouarobotorsimilar


I certainly didn't think the comments weren't human-generated. I was actually defending you. I just think your style of commenting comes across as unusual here, which is why it attracts attention. On other parts of the Internet the style you use is more common and would not raise eyebrows.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: