Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Your quibble with the title is addressed by reading 3-4 paragraphs into the long story.

This sort of aggressive argument obscures the meaning and intent of the actual article in favor of some kind of editorial flavoring issue.

This behavior is warranted at times but here it just argumentative for no purpose.



Honestly the OP comment was helpful for me, because I was confused I read the story wrong, or that I missed something.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: