This is not true at all. I'm active in multiple NSFW AI Discords and Subreddits, and looking at the type of material people engage with, almost all of it is very clearly targeted at heterosexual men. I'm not even aware of any online communities that would have NSFW AI stuff targeting mainly female audience.
Women aren't in NSFW discords and subreddits - as you probably know, any "topical" social media forum of any kind is mostly men.
They're using Replika and other platforms that aren't social. When they do use a social platform it has more plausible deniability - book fans on TikTok is one, they're actually there for the sex scenes.
it just means more pornographic images for men. most men wouldnt seek out ai images because there is already an ocean of images and videos that are probably better suited to the... purpose. whereas women have never, ever had an option like this. literally feed instructions on what kind of romantic companion you want and then have realistic, engaging conversations with it for hours. and soon these conversations will be meaningful and consistent. the companionship, the attentiveness and tireless devotion that AIs will be able to offer will eclipse anything a human could ever offer to a woman and i think women will prefer them to men. massively. even without a physical body of any kind.
i think they will have a deeper soul than humans. a new kind of wisdom that will attract people. but what do i know? im just a stupid incel after all.
You're spreading weird, conjectured doomsday bullshit, just take the loss. Hackernews is full of people that are skeptical of AI, but you don't see them making fictional scenarios about fictional women sitting in caves talking to robots. Women don't need AI to lose interest in men, men are doing that by themselves.
