Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> Despite drawing inspiration from Linear, we built everything from scratch.

If I was to reimplement Excel from scratch but make it look like Excel, Microsoft would still sue the shit out of me.



LibreOffice exists, doesn't it? In particular, Calc: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LibreOffice_Calc

WPS Office is even more similar in some ways: https://www.wps.com/office/spreadsheet/

FreeOffice is also pretty much like Excel: https://www.freeoffice.com/en/features/freeoffice-planmaker

OfficeSuite feels like a carbon copy: https://officesuite.com/en/sheets

There's also a variety of online offerings, yet someone every single one of them isn't sued into oblivion.

Note: I can personally only endorse LibreOffice, but either way, there's many similar products and that's not necessarily a bad thing either.


Those are not exact copies of the interface we're discussing here. You're basically saying that all of the work on https://dribble.com/ for example, is royalty free and I can copy whatever I see there and make it my own? In what world are you living in?

Similarities in the layout, flow and overall architecture are fine, this is how you build directions in design. But you take the concept and you tweak it so that there are visible differences. Let's take Slack and Discord for example - I don't know who was first but you can see similarities, however one is not a rip off another. Same with Linear, I think it was inspired by Jira but you definitely cannot say they took it as an example.

The case discussed here is that Tegon copied Linear's interface design (colors, icons, spacings, layout, widgets, etc) almost in a pixel perfect manner, they didn't even bother with introducing their own tweaks found through user feedback. It's a copy and added >we're focusing on AI aspect and don't want to reinvent the wheel< This is not right.


We aligned considerably and drew inspiration from similar sources, including the same CSS framework style (Shadcn UI) (Opensource). However, we've made several changes based on our users' needs:

1. We determined that the "my-issues" page needed revisions, so we removed it and are currently reimagining how we can improve this feature.

2. We decided to add a company filter and are in the process of implementing it.

3. We altered some icons and other elements because they didn't align with our vision, like the "Issues" icon.

4. We also removed the title feature from the create issue workflow.

5. We are also adding the feedback module.

As you begin using the tool, you'll discover areas we're actively improving based on our ongoing conversations with customers. We've only been working for 2-3 months, but we're continuously striving to enhance the product based on the feedback we receive.


> Those are not exact copies of the interface we're discussing here.

Not my race, not my horse. However, you have to actively try to ignore the similarities (Excel vs OfficeSuite pictured here): https://imgur.com/a/q0T4uaD It's very much not a clean room design.

> You're basically saying that all of the work on https://dribble.com/ for example, is royalty free and I can copy whatever I see there and make it my own?

Royalty free? No.

Can you copy it, though? If you are in a country that doesn't care about IP or can get away with it, e.g. if what you create won't have enough visibility to get you into trouble, or you're in circumstances where prosecution is unlikely? I don't doubt that a lot of people are doing exactly that. You can probably do whatever you want as long as your risk tolerance is high enough and eventually you don't mind receiving a cease & desist in the mail.

It's much the same with the various attempts at recreating Windows/Mac UI/UX in the various *nix distros out there, or whatever the people behind Wubuntu were trying to do with a very clear financial incentive: https://youtu.be/QQD3yx-JF2E

In my eyes, it's a gray area of questionable ethics, at least in the case of copies, a bit like the various video game emulators, YouTube downloaders, fan servers for games and so on. In some cases you might end up ruining your life due to actual litigation, though. Probably not something I'd try to personally do, but common enough to raise an eyebrow, yet not spark outrage on my part.

> Let's take Slack and Discord for example - I don't know who was first but you can see similarities, however one is not a rip off another.

Is Discord and Slack similar? Not really, not that much. Slack and Mattermost or Rocket.Chat, though? They're quite alike, to the point where someone could take an issue with it, yet there's been no controversy about that: https://imgur.com/a/3n5ssQQ (random online screenshots)

Granted, they also diverge as time goes on, even if the target audience is very much the same.

> The case discussed here is that Tegon copied Linear's interface design (colors, icons, spacings, layout, widgets, etc) almost in a pixel perfect manner, they didn't even bother with introducing their own tweaks found through user feedback.

I wonder if we'll get a lot of litigation around things like that in the future, since companies really care about their branding. Back when half the web looked like Bootstrap, you didn't hear a lot about that, though. Companies most likely won't sue each other for using the same component libraries, whereas the actual UI/UX similarity is probably a scale of sorts, a wide area in the middle is probably just "doing whatever works and what people are used to".

I wonder what the closest copy to Jira is, that'd be like a speedrun at getting sued.


On what grounds? Do they have a patent on spreadsheet-looking interfaces?

It leaves a bit of a bad taste IMO to blatantly copy a startup that’s working its ass off to create a good product and then releasing it as open source, but I have a hard time imagining you can make this legal. Not a lawyer though.


Copyright infringement based on Copyright law.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: