> I don't think there's a way to make intelligence safe without crippling it.
Not without reading the questioner’s mind. Or maybe if the AI had access to your social credit score, it could decide what information you should be privy to.
</sarc>
Seriously though, it’s all about who gets to decide what “safe” means. It seemed widely understood letting censors be the arbiters for “safe” was a slippery slope, but here we are two generations later as if nothing was learned.
Turns out most are happy to censor as long as they believe they are the ones in charge.
Not without reading the questioner’s mind. Or maybe if the AI had access to your social credit score, it could decide what information you should be privy to. </sarc>
Seriously though, it’s all about who gets to decide what “safe” means. It seemed widely understood letting censors be the arbiters for “safe” was a slippery slope, but here we are two generations later as if nothing was learned.
Turns out most are happy to censor as long as they believe they are the ones in charge.