> You always want to work in a product that maintains a decent one.
That'd be lovely indeed. I have never seen one that I felt comfortable with, though. And I've seen a few.
When LLMs rose in popularity, I had hopes of having a way to tackle the problem of formulating requirements in a way that would be less painful than it is now.
To me, computer programming is a form of communication, where the requirements are close to humans, and program code is nearer to the machine. On the computer side, we have linters, compilers, and a deterministic system that executes the code. On the human side we have people stating requirements such as "The system should be easy to use."
That'd be lovely indeed. I have never seen one that I felt comfortable with, though. And I've seen a few.
When LLMs rose in popularity, I had hopes of having a way to tackle the problem of formulating requirements in a way that would be less painful than it is now.
To me, computer programming is a form of communication, where the requirements are close to humans, and program code is nearer to the machine. On the computer side, we have linters, compilers, and a deterministic system that executes the code. On the human side we have people stating requirements such as "The system should be easy to use."