Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> must once again point you back to the article

Where in it does it absolve those fired who weren’t physically on premises of otherwise being involved?



They said they weren't involved. But they were involved in protesting. Does standing in front of a doorway require a comlpicated planning initiative?

There is absolutely nothing they could have done other than speak about it. Which is all they're being accused of anyway.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: