He’s saying he doesn’t see the basis for the complaints. The Hunter Biden laptop scandal? Even the New York Post (not exactly a left-leaning publication) only ran with the story with the original reporter insisting his byline be omitted and the reporter who was given the byline wasn’t informed of this happening because while the laptop was Biden’s, the validity of the contents could not be verified and had roughly the validity of the Bush National Guard letter.
>He’s saying he doesn’t see the basis for the complaints.
Their partisan political coverage is the basis for the complaints.
>the validity of the contents could not be verified
The contents were verified as authentic. Additionally, the FBI had the contents years before the public release and they knew it was authentic.
>Testimony Reveals FBI Employees Who Warned Social Media Companies about Hack and Leak Operation Knew Hunter Biden Laptop Wasn’t Russian Disinformation
>DOJ confirms in new court filing it indeed belonged to Hunter Biden
They were not verified as authentic. You and whoever read that filing misunderstood it. (More importantly, if any component was verified that does not mean the whole thing is.)
Also, in the same special counsel[0] filing they attached a picture of a table saw covered in sawdust and said it was a picture Hunter Biden had taken of "apparent cocaine".
[0] who is a DOJ employee but it's misleading to call him "DOJ", since he's not controlled by them
