>But photogrammetry has already been a thing for quite awhile.
Current photogrammetry to my knowledge requires much more data than NeRfs/Gaussian splatting. So this could be a way to get more data for the "dumb" photogrammetry algorithms to work with.
Right? I'm surprised I don't hear this connection more often. Is it perhaps because photogrammetry algorithms require sharp edges, which the splats don't offer?
Current photogrammetry to my knowledge requires much more data than NeRfs/Gaussian splatting. So this could be a way to get more data for the "dumb" photogrammetry algorithms to work with.