Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Artists will use the tools available to them to create art that speaks to them and for them, regardless of how "artless" the tool might be.


Not sure if you've talked to many artists, but quite a large majority oppose AI, and in practice what "speaks to them" is art created without the interference of AI. (I am one of them, but there are many others).


Many artists also opposed the synthesizer.

I think it's too early to tell how this plays out.


Perhaps, with some issues, we should not let them "play out". I feel like our tendency to let things play out all the time has been a diaster for humanity.


It's funny, I've mostly encountered 'artless' as a complementary descriptor.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: