Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> I do mean radical; cars shouldnt be able to go faster than 30 mph

You might just ban them at that point. Why waste ANY resources on a car? We could return to horse drawn carriages, they are biological and therefore more environmentally friendly [1]

[1] https://www.historic-uk.com/HistoryUK/HistoryofBritain/Great...



Horse poo covering streets is not particularly friendly to the environment.


> Horse poo covering streets is not particularly friendly to the environment.

Most people did not own horses, especially not in cities.

They were generally limited to farmers, businesses (to draw carts/carriages), and the rich (Gilded Age).

For most of history most humans walked to their destination on a day-to-day basis. This changed slightly with the invention of rail roads and later bicycles. The automobile didn't go mainstream until roughly the 1920s:

* https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262516129/fighting-traffic/

Look at any pre-WW2 development and you'll see neighbourhoods built for human scale:

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streetcar_suburb

Design things 'properly' and neither cars, nor horse-drawn carriages, are needed by people for most of their daily tasks. This is evidence by the fact that humans lived like that for centuries just fine.


Huh, humans live for centuries in caves also just fine. I don't know why cities, streets and bicycles are needed.


> Huh, humans live for centuries in caves also just fine.

Less draft-y, better control temperature, and indoor plumbing with modern building science.

> I don't know why cities, streets and bicycles are needed.

Cities have less environmental impact, streets offer easier movement, and bicycles are probably the most efficient way of a human being moving.

I'm not sure how designing communities where private automobiles are a necessity improved upon communities where they are optional nice-to-haves.


Not that I want to ban cars, but I’d have to imagine that horse feces is better for the environment than motor oil and other fluids that leak from a car.


That is far to complex to make any statement on.

Feces (including horse) spread disease. Motor oil leaking is mostly leaking on places where nothing grows anyway because all the traffic compacts the earth and so plants cannot grow (Deer in woods make trails where plants cannot grow, this isn't about cars at all) . As such I give the win to the leaking fluids for the local environment.

Cars generally are burning fossil fuels and putting more CO2 into the air. A horse is burning plants and so are net zero CO2 (assuming you don't use fuels to make the hay!) So for the earth horses are better.

Both cars and horses can kill people if they hit them. Car drives generally pay some attention, and horses generally will not run over people. However there are failures where both can kill. I don't know how to find statistic to tell which is worse in practice though.

A horse is a rich man's toy. Generally in the horse days humans walked, even the rich would walk most of the time - you can walk just as far and fast as a horse in a day. The horse was used to pull carts or carry heavy loads (though most people fail to realize just how much a human can carry and give the horse too much credit here). While a car is the common person's way to get around even when they could walk. Thus for human's the horse is a win because you exercise (though I'd really want to add a bicycle to this analysis)


> A horse is a rich man's toy.

To be a tad pedantic, it's more accurate to say a "rich woman's toy".

The vast majority of horse owners/managers are women [1].

[1] https://www.statista.com/statistics/388979/gender-distributi...


That is correct in these days. 100 years ago things were different.


I generally agree with your reply, minus the first part. Yes, oil drops on the road where aren’t growing food, but we cannot ignore the fact that rain sweeps oil away into waterways which is awful for local wildlife. Feces washing into the waterways isn’t ideal, but I’d wager it’s better for the fish than oil.


Depends on the amount of each. One liter of oil is less friendly than one dung, but average car leaks much less oil than a horse produces dung. Several tons of dung in one place is not that good, look at big animal farm runoff. Cars were hailed as solution for horse dung problem.


Do horses fart as much as cows?


But they are slow and don't use petroleum products. Fast and petroleum based is used as an argument against car ownership.


- the Model T had a too speed of 40 mph. Hardly a speed deamon

- Horses dont do 30 mph sustained

- Horses eat. A lot

- Horses need care

- More horse riding would be a good thing




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: