> I pay for GPT4 enterprise, try again, only this time answer the question.

When I'm frustrated, I talk to ChatGPT like that.

It works as well for the LLM as it does for the humans in this thread.

What's worse is, I'd been writing some SciFi set in 2030 since well before Transformer models were invented, and predicted in early drafts of my fiction that you'd get better results from AI if you treated them with the same courtesies that you'd use for a human just because they learn by mimicking us (which turned out to be true), and yet I'm still making this mistake IRL when I talk to the AI…

it's almost as if you're so hyped over this you take someone cautioning that it's not magic as the enemy.

maybe stop doing that.

The PDF example being thrown around in this thread. There's a magical step in the middle that no one is acknowledging.

What Step? Do you think we're lying? I literally have built an application which takes in PDF's and extracts over 2 dozen values from it via prompting with Langchain. Do you think I'm a paid OpenAI sponsor or what?

You also realize that OpenAI has a dedicated Document Assistant which will literally extract information from a document you upload using prompts? Are you just unable to get that to work? I just don't know what you arguing at this point, like you're watching people walk backwards and then yelling that it's impossible for humans to walk backwards.

odd that you keep using that word prompts.

Yes you send a message to the API containing the context you are interested in along with questions about that context the LLM can answer. The parlance commonly used refers to that message as a prompt. I don't know if you're delusional or just completely clueless about how LLM's work.