Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> It is hard to imagine the FCC wouldn’t notice that there was no signal on that AM station for that amount of time, or the owner, or the power company.

Maybe the typical approach of having flaky monitoring and after enough time, you simply chalk it up to "well, seems the monitoring is offline again, but no one is complaining so probably the thing still works"?

Alternatively, the owner did notice it was missing, but reporting it as missing would also mean they have to shut down FM service, so they left it until someone complained/noticed.



> so probably the thing still works"?

I’m sure radio operators know this one weird trick to confirm that theory: Turn on your AM car radio.


You're confusing two different parties involved in the monitoring here: the FCC and the station owner.

The station owner likely knew within a few hours to a few days that the tower went offline. At the very least the power bill would have been very low or non-existent that month which would make it pretty obvious. And to your point they could tune their FM radio to their station frequency and see if it works.

The FCC is a federal organization. I doubt they have an office in Jasper Alabama. So the FCC monitoring is the one in question here. Because as soon as the FCC notices the AM station is down, then the FM translation (which is what the station was really marketed around and gaining its viewership from) is shut down. Which means the station owner is out of a job. The FCC's monitoring is probably not realtime and I could see someone at the FCC getting an alert that this AM station in Jasper Alabama is down and they do think to themselves the monitoring is bad or flaky and don't immediately panic. The FCC isn't going to be able to just tune their radio to the AM station to check since they aren't in range of the station.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: