Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Notably, organizations are almost always led by disagreeable folks.

It’s a pain in the ass to lead disagreeable people.

Agreeable people are often terrible leaders, as they’ll as often lead a team off a cliff as say no. Or be unable to actually drive action among a group of disagreeing people.

leading often requires coming up with your own answer based on the circumstances you’re seeing - someone can’t ‘agree’ their way out of that.

That said, someone too disagreeable will just cause friction and internal issues all the time for no value add. Disagreeing with the right/proper thing to do is just being a pain in ass for the sake of being a pain in the ass.

Usually, the organization has settled on a middle ground somewhere for each level of it’s hierarchy.

Very top down organizations usually need very agreeable ‘bottom’ layers to do the grunt work. It has predictable consequences - good and bad.

There is a reason why militaries pride themselves on ‘breaking down’/‘rebuilding’ people in basic. And why officers almost always go through a separate process.



All completely true. Neuroticism seems to be the most complex one for leaders...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: