Dan Preston is a NIMBY dressed in wolves clothes. Like most progressive agendas in SF they do very little to actually secure more housing. They make for great tag lines to pull support in and NOTHING changes.
> Dan Preston is a NIMBY dressed in wolves clothes.
Citation?
> They make for great tag lines to pull support in and NOTHING changes.
Two questions, independent
* Is that the fault of those advocating for change? Are they failing to introduce legislation or is their legislation not making out of committee or whatever due to opposition? Sincere question
* Is there a candidate which would walk the walk better on actually implementing the popular policies which Dan advocates for?
