It invalidates by twisting.

Rhetorically speaking it's simple to make the biggest in some class seem to be worst in some related class. If I'm the biggest taxi operator in town, I'm likely to have the highest CO₂ emissions of all the taxi companies, see? You can omit or deemphasise the connection between the two and make me seem bad.

It's just a form of lying by omission.

>says he believes the social media company is the “largest marketplace for predators and paedophiles globally”.

Doesn't sound like a fact.

On FB it's easier to find them compared to Telegram for instance

100% of pedos drink water! 100% of pedos breath same air as you and me!

Wow, what a fact.

Meta profits from pedo drinking their water.

Buses profit from pedos spying on kids in them. Google and Apple profit from pedos using their phones to spy on kids. Public infrastructure provides convenience for pedos to do their dirty work.

I can continue like that for a long time, you know.

Kind of does.

Facts don't mean anything without perspective.