Your comments suggest you have significantly more time to spare than I do. (However, I understand this is just my interpretation.)
I'm entitled to my opinion on INTU and the government, regardless of whether it's factual or not. You're interpreting my views as anti-government negativity, which I don't agree with. Additionally, I wasn't aware that writing a research paper with proper citations was part of the conversation. To conclude, it seems your primary interest lies in debate.
> They also might own shares of INTU... Even that is not criminal.
Right but acting on inside information would be illegal.
You're 100% incorrect on that last point. Although not a formal legal document this article makes it pretty clear Senators and Representatives have a loophole in regards to trading on stocks. https://blogs.luc.edu/compliance/?p=4459
I will no longer respond to this thread as it's now reached the point of no return. In the meantime have a great day!
Right but acting on inside information would be illegal.
You're 100% incorrect on that last point. Although not a formal legal document this article makes it pretty clear Senators and Representatives have a loophole in regards to trading on stocks. https://blogs.luc.edu/compliance/?p=4459
I will no longer respond to this thread as it's now reached the point of no return. In the meantime have a great day!