If they fractional reserve too much then they risk going bust as they can't just print more bitcoin in the event of a bank run. Just like the good old days before central banking.
I'm not a fan of crypto as an investment, but I have no problem with this.
If you are investing with in multiple ETFs and are interested in investing,not owning, in BTC, this makes things simpler - you buy the ETF, the exchange buys the BTC.
If it reaches a point where everyone is just holding for returns, then it could be a timebomb until it all crashes. We could be there already.
No there is a hard limit of 21m Bitcoins. You can't just "print more".
Yes it's possible to trade "paper bitcoins" but if you don't own the underlying asset you are always at risk of being found out and not being able to cover the amount.
You don't. It's illegal to travel with more than $X over boarder Y. Embargos and different banking systems and culture make 'bank transfers' inaccessible to a majority of people in this world.
The only alternatives are western union and other private companies with 10+% fees or hidden private banking networks like 'Hawala'.
How long before the amount of bitcoins traded by hedge funds will be larger than the amount of bitcoins that exist in the actual bitcoin network?