> Almost everything you wrote is available for any modern IDE ... So they give all the things you mentioned ...
I guess, I've misread your comment somehow.
But anyway, my point is that modern IDEs can't give the same experience as or replace Vim, Neovim, Emacs. And while you don't need that experience, there are plenty of people who do. Nothing wrong with either side =-)
> my point is that modern IDEs can't give the same experience as or replace Vim, Neovim, Emacs
Every time I ask "what experience is that", all I get back is "unique editor" and "you can write macros for repetitive tasks".
No, thank you. I prefer the experience of an IDE that doesn't think that your code is plain text and offers tools that text editors stuck 30-40 years in the past know nothing about.
I guess, I've misread your comment somehow.
But anyway, my point is that modern IDEs can't give the same experience as or replace Vim, Neovim, Emacs. And while you don't need that experience, there are plenty of people who do. Nothing wrong with either side =-)