European made wind still dominates European installs.
China supplies its own massively growing domestic market as well as others.
It's starting to make inroads into Europe, Japan and other places where politicians have sabotaged the renewable transition to the detriment of local manufacturing, but that's a relative recent phenomenon for wind, slightly behind the pace blazed by the same countries on solar.
"Expensive" French nuclear electricity is around half the price of "cheap" German electricity.
The numbers that get passed around the anti-nuke fan-communities are usually completely bogus, for example one uses the price of the Vogtle plant in the US, pretty much the plant with the most time + cost overruns, as the "cost of nuclear".
With that level of wrong, it is hard to attribute it to just incompetence and not malice.
p.s.: As the biggest part of the cost of a nuclear plant currently is finance, i.e. interest payments, time delays = cost overruns.
EDF had to be bought by the state because it failed to make any profits. The price of nuclear power in France is regulated, which is why EDF failed to make profits. The actual cost for EDF to produce power is secret. The financials leave zero room for new construction, barely cover maintenance and there is insufficient money for decommissioning existing plants.
EDF was bought out by the state because the state had been siphoning off all its profits.
> The price of nuclear power in France is regulated, which is why EDF failed to make profits.
Exactly. Cheap nuclear electricity was used for decades to subsidize all sorts of industries and endeavors, never allowing EdF to actually profit from the cheap generating capacity.
Whereas with solar and wind, we ship the money to China.