“Successful” here appears to be measured in dollars and time spent working. When you get older and survey the successful of your peers, it becomes really obvious balance and love was the key to success.
Maybe taking advice from a 38 year old on being successful isn’t the right approach. Maybe you should source your advice from people closer to the end of life than the beginning. I’d rather read his reflections at age 78.
No, he was 34 years old when he wrote this points. There are good points nonetheless. Not everything is money but there are definitely things here that you can apply to your social life as well.
Success can’t be observed in the moment. You only can gauge success in retrospect. How do you know his advice is durable and yields a success that’s anything more than a momentary excitement? His “social life advice” can’t be evaluated until his life has been lived. Are his friends transactional? Does his advice only hold if you have something others want from you?
Taking advice on life from a 34 year old is taking advice from someone who hasn’t lived life yet. They might have some hot take tips and they might even have good advice about how to tactically achieve certain goals. But their advice comes with no actual wisdom, no actual analysis of things from a longer perspective of having done things, seen the results, and observed the consequences over time. They can’t, because experience isn’t innate, it isn’t a skill, it is only earned with time and reflection. Perhaps he’s reflecting, and that’s wonderful. And I’ll be happy to read his advice in 30 years and compare it against mine. But the young taking the advice of the young is the blind leading the blind.
Sir, your comment breaks the site guidelines. Do better. Sam Altman is an entrepreneurial hero and not a cult leader. He deserves more reverence and respect.
Great essay. You can tell from the writing Sam Altman is just a great person who cares about making things people want instead of just enriching himself at the expense of everyone else.
I do not see those as a dichotomy: care to elaborate where's this essay significantly about making what people want instead of guessing what's going to exponentially grow in value long term?
He even talks about owning being more important than selling time (which you need to create, right?), so I think you are misreading or misrepresenting the essay by making this personal (he might be all the things you claim, but it totally does not flow from this piece).
Basically every self help book or essay has a similar structure of enumerated platitudes and some huge assumptions about what success actually is and how it is achieved baked in. They are also almost never applicable to anyone, not even the person who wrote it. They’re often more reflections of what they wish were the secrets to their “success,” when in fact it’s mostly luck. Instead they distill some personal philosophy mixed with cultural norms of success, dress it up with confidence, and throw in some twists of their own, and sell it as “this is how I did it, you can too.”
Seriously if you’ve read a few you’ve read them all. It’s like programming languages - once you’ve learned a handful the next one is about spotting the differences.
I do wonder how he manages to collect 30 million dollars on a failed startup and is still trusted by investors afterwards. How do you do that? And I usually get accused of too much self-belief.
I have trouble justifying 2-3 months of work to my manager.
Maybe taking advice from a 38 year old on being successful isn’t the right approach. Maybe you should source your advice from people closer to the end of life than the beginning. I’d rather read his reflections at age 78.