> if you don't think it's worth starring why even use it let along issues and pr's.
- it's a dependency downstream and it's breaking my actual project.
- I'm in evaluation/research phase for multiple repos and am not committed to that specific tool. Actions like this actively make me NOT want to star such behavior, nor even use the tool if I can help it
- because I don't fundamentally use stars as a popularity stick and don't care. I'd rather you prompt me to post a bounty or donation instead. Yes, that's how much I hate that system; I will pay money to not be involved in it.
>Can't projects say they'll only support people who really like the project or are people thinking OSS comes with entitlements for unpaying users.
if you ignore the meta-gaming reasons this tactic exists, sure. I'd rather just pay the project directly instead be a part of a statitic that says "we got X stars on our repo please fund us" VC pitches.
> it's a dependency downstream and it's breaking my actual project.
You depend on it but so much as clicking in a star button is burdensome? Come on!
> I'm in evaluation/research phase for multiple repos and am not committed to that specific tool. Actions like this actively make me NOT want to star such behavior, nor even use the tool if I can help it
Then the author's don't want you to use their project, so fork it or move on.
> because I don't fundamentally use stars as a popularity stick and don't care. I'd rather you prompt me to post a bounty or donation instead. Yes, that's how much I hate that system; I will pay money to not be involved in it.
This isn't about you, it's a button the author cares about, so support them with it for their sake, if they want money they will ask for it.
> I'd rather just pay the project directly instead be a part of a statitic that says "we got X stars on our repo please fund us" VC pitches.
You are not part of any of thay, you are just supporting someone making their hard work free and open source in the way they want to be supported. This boils down to how you wish to support them and how you wish the system worked without a single consideration into their right to not support you for any reason at all. The software is already FOSS, you downvote their post and anything defending them because what? Being free and open isn't enough, you also deserve free labour and in your own terms?
>You depend on it but so much as clicking in a star button is burdensome? Come on!
I don't. Something I use depends on something depends on something... Depends on it, and I might not even agree with the dependency. I'm not rewarding something because of someone else's decision to use it.
>Then the author's don't want you to use their project, so fork it or move on.
At that point yes, I move on.
>This isn't about you.
Someone requests an action of me and people are confused by my response. So yes, it is about me. I can and do just say "no" and move on, but if people want me to clarify I will.
>You are not part of any of tha
Well they just made me a part of it. Congrats.
>The software is already FOSS, you downvote their post and anything defending them because what?
A lack of a star is not a downvote. And I'm very glad you can't downvote a repo. What a mess that would be. Why are you taking my inaction so personally? Who or what am I downcotijf to begin with?
I seel at this point you're arguing with a very different person than me.
> I don't. Something I use depends on something depends on something... Depends on it, and I might not even agree with the dependency. I'm not rewarding something because of someone else's decision to use it.
That's your problem, this project is not responsible for your dependency on it with or without your choice!
> Someone requests an action of me and people are confused by my response. So yes, it is about me. I can and do just say "no" and move on, but if people want me to clarify I will.
Ok, so long as we agree it is their right to require arbitrary things as is yours to ditch them.
> Well they just made me a part of it
In the same way every human is a part of it? I don't follow.
> A lack of a star is not a downvote. And I'm very glad you can't downvote a repo.
No kidding. HN'ers are downvoting on the issue if you care to click on the link of the post and see.
I don't care about your inaction, I care about the negative entitled jerk sentiment on this thread!
- it's a dependency downstream and it's breaking my actual project.
- I'm in evaluation/research phase for multiple repos and am not committed to that specific tool. Actions like this actively make me NOT want to star such behavior, nor even use the tool if I can help it
- because I don't fundamentally use stars as a popularity stick and don't care. I'd rather you prompt me to post a bounty or donation instead. Yes, that's how much I hate that system; I will pay money to not be involved in it.
>Can't projects say they'll only support people who really like the project or are people thinking OSS comes with entitlements for unpaying users.
if you ignore the meta-gaming reasons this tactic exists, sure. I'd rather just pay the project directly instead be a part of a statitic that says "we got X stars on our repo please fund us" VC pitches.