Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Profits.

By allowing Android <--> Apple communication, Apple has potential "loses" as they loose their lock in ability of forcing people buying a new iPhone for Christmas.

iPhone $800, Android $200. If an Android can do what iPhone can do on the messaging front there's no purpose in buying an iPhone.



Is the grocery store stealing profits from the other grocery store next door? This is a ridiculous concept. Maybe that was your point?


Just want to point out that you can get a brand new iPhone (in the US) for $429 (+ tax), and often times you can get it even cheaper if you trade in or accept carrier deals. I dont think that iMessage is the only sticky property of the iPhone. Things like long term support via updates is another big one. The “ecosystem” of devices and services.

Comparable devices cost pretty much the same whether iPhone or Android.

While most people may not care it’s also worth noting that the alternative OS (Android) is operated by one of the largest ad-tech companies in the world and allows for deep oem integrations of 3rd party applications (that 99.9% of its users aren’t even aware of as being installed.)


You can get a brand new Android for 80-100$. What's the point?


My intention was to point out that the price gap wasn’t as great as it was made out to be. What part of my response can I clarify?


You can't steal profits, it's an abstract concept.


In other words, they are stealing Apple's monopoly?

And that's a problem...why?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: