Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

This is not a strong argument as it doesn't consider all aspects.

1. Public drunkness is still a problem 2. Drunk driving still kills a lot of people. Legalization of alcohol doesn't help.



History shows that making it illegal didn't work either.


When it comes to dangerous drugs, nothing "works". We have to choose the least-bad policies.

A lot of people, including me, thought the war on drugs was pretty much the worst policy position. Now I'm seeing that there are (perhaps) worse policies. We need to be quantitative and nuanced, not speak in sweeping characterizations.


To paraphrase an unknown Marine drill Sergeant: "Everyone either needs the carrot or the stick, it's my job to figure out which".


Right. The reason the prohibition failed was because it was not very nuanced. Whatever is done needs to be done in a controlled, nuanced way.


The fact that _drunk driving_ is illegal reduces it dramatically.


Execution matters. See Singapore.


Its definitely interesting how some places are outright banning tobacco sales, and other places are decriminalizing hard drugs.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: