Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It's good that it's testable. This is one of those ideas which either wins a Nobel Prize or is totally bogus. So what does it take to test it?


Bogus usually implies something meant as a fake or counterfeit, I think a better way to describe it would be "incorrect", I don't think these scientists are trying to fake anything.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: