Singapore economy is a result of foreign investment aided by very generous tax benefits and a repressive regime that ensured for a long time a low paid and compliant work-force. Being also basically a city-state without natural resources, Singapore was always trade-oriented and as a commercial hub of course it is in an extraordinary position to engage in free-trade.
But believing that the same recipe could be applied for Argentina, South-Africa or Brasil takes a lot more faith
But what is funny about the Singapore example always abused on those conversations is that it begs the question of why people always cite a more or less tiny Asian city-state as the most prominent case of the success of free-trade instead of bigger economies like the US, China, Japan, South Korea or the UE.
And the reason for that is that all those nations have always engaged and still engage on protectionist practices while expecting less developed markets to open their borders. Subsides, Non-Tax Barriers, Direct government investments, taxes and fees, you name it, they did and they do it.
But believing that the same recipe could be applied for Argentina, South-Africa or Brasil takes a lot more faith
But what is funny about the Singapore example always abused on those conversations is that it begs the question of why people always cite a more or less tiny Asian city-state as the most prominent case of the success of free-trade instead of bigger economies like the US, China, Japan, South Korea or the UE.
And the reason for that is that all those nations have always engaged and still engage on protectionist practices while expecting less developed markets to open their borders. Subsides, Non-Tax Barriers, Direct government investments, taxes and fees, you name it, they did and they do it.