It is not AI policy but generative AI policy, and thus I do wonder how ill-advised these are:
"Examines how the state could prioritize tools to expand program access, improve the speed of ongoing work, summarize and classify information, and utilize complex datasets, and highlights the importance of secure, controlled pilots in doing so;"
"Highlights potential uses for improving accessibility to government services, including identifying groups that – for language barriers or other reasons – are disproportionately not accessing services for which they are eligible;"
A million dollar question, don't you think? That said, my point above was about the terminological confusion, i.e. you shouldn't use generative AI for that kind of stuff, which is pretty standard application domain for applied ML/statistics.
"Examines how the state could prioritize tools to expand program access, improve the speed of ongoing work, summarize and classify information, and utilize complex datasets, and highlights the importance of secure, controlled pilots in doing so;"
"Highlights potential uses for improving accessibility to government services, including identifying groups that – for language barriers or other reasons – are disproportionately not accessing services for which they are eligible;"