Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It really was not, or link to the "beating" result.


It was in 2014.

https://www.vice.com/en/article/gvyy5m/how-a-computer-beat-t...

The turing test is a shit test for general intelligence, you can game it by making the AI generate a story that is more engaging than a typical boring human would do. Those stories will get much more human votes than a regular human. Some will go off track and notice it is a dumb program, but those are the minority so on average this dumb bot will pass the turing test.


This was a severely constrained version with limited public record, so paint me skeptical.

For instance there was a 5 minute limit.

From the article:

    Simultaneous tests as specified by Alan Turing
    Each judge was involved in five parallel tests - so 10 conversations
    30 judges took part
    In total 300 conversations
    In each five minutes a judge was communicating with both a human and a machine
    Each of the five machines took part in 30 tests
    To ensure accuracy of results, Test was independently adjudicated by Professor John Barnden, University of Birmingham, formerly head of British AI Society
5 tests in 5 minutes that's just 1 minute each. In 1 minute it would be challenging to figure out you're not talking to ELIZA.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: