Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> I think the truth is that these two companies were a great fit for Musk's style in particular, not that Musk is necessarily a great leader.

Tesla was barely more than an idea when he joined and he started SpaceX. You are speaking nonesense. His leadership style obviously finds employees who accept or even thrive in it. The success speaks for itself.

> What I mean is that Musk is reportedly overbearing and extremely demanding as a leader, and if you don't deliver he will fire you without hesitation. In most organizations that would quickly lead to morale and staffing quality problems, but SpaceX and Tesla worked on really sexy problems, so people were willing to put up with a lot of bullshit and abuse in exchange for getting to work on those problems.

All that you have said just as much applies to Jobs. Just because you might find that style of leadership unappealing there is a type of person who seeks it out.



The comparison between Musk and Jobs is kind of absurd.

Jobs' greatest strength was probably his way with people. He was a perfectionist, and if you got his way he was merciless, but he was also deeply charismatic and persuasive, and seemed to have an eye for talent. There are many stories about him personally persuading people to come onboard or stay, here is one:

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/04/09/how-steve-jobs-convinced-tim...

And here's a relevant Wikipedia article:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality_distortion_field

Elon, by contrast... Uh, Elon is autistic.


> The comparison between Musk and Jobs is kind of absurd.

No it is not. You're just blinded by Musk derangement syndrome and grasping at any straws that might dismiss his accomplishments.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: