Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I am old enough to remember when cubicles and offices were the norm. Cubicle companies studied and improved the cubicles spaces to make them more efficient using science. Yes they actually studied what would make us happier and more proficient at work.

Then came the stupid trend of organic seating. Cubicle’s ? Thing of the past they said, yet our productivity suffered. Great for sprints but quickly diminished due to constant distractions forcing engineers to invest in noise canceling headphones.

The WFH movement is because water flows downhill. We learned that we made the office an incredibly inefficient place to work, because we didn’t follow the science and threw away decades of research because of a new ‘fad’ that the CEO’s liked. Too bad CEO’s, I have been WFH ever since corporate America thought organic seating was cool.

I will never go back, in fact us programmers should unite and unionize to solidify this benefit before they try and take this away for good and make our jobs more difficult.



Re: "'fad' that CEO's liked." My previous CEO: "We all have to be in an open office every day to enhance productivity." Also my previous CEO: "I'll be working from my house in the Hamptons during July and August." :-)


> Yes they actually studied what would make us happier and more proficient at work.

And they utterly failed.

But I'm willing to put up with cubes for the right job. There is no job that would be worth putting up with an open office layout or, worse, hot-desking.

I would think that if companies want people back in the office so badly, they would be willing to do something to make working in the office pleasant and productive. But I guess that's not how they think.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: