Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

That’s fair. I view it as just business. It certainly doesn’t affect me or any consumer. It only affects Valve, which I don’t care about. Maybe valve should pay developers more. Epic takes far less than steam does from developers, so I definitely understand the appeal to developers.



It does affect some consumers, without valve and proton, I would probably not be playing many games.


Proton works for non-steam games too.


> It certainly doesn’t affect me or any consumer.

  $ ./EpicInstaller-15.17.1.msi 
  bash: ./EpicInstaller-15.17.1.msi: cannot execute binary file: Exec format error
Turns out Epic doesn't work on my platform of choice. Apparently it does affect me. Certainly.


Neither does steam on my opened router. This is a nonsensical argument.


No it isn't. I can play lots of games on my machine. I can't play, specifically, Alan Wake 2, since it's unavailable for purchase either standalone or an a platform that supports Linux.

Of course it's their choice where to release it, but saying, specifically, that it doesn't affect any consumer is just plain wrong.


It does effect you. Its a reduction of choice that benefits no one.

And since there's a vastly bigger audience on Steam vs the Epic Store, I don't really think that split matters as much as people would have you believe.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: