Somewhat amazed at the structure of this article: after first discussing the third-party for 75% of blog post, the first-party recovery efforts were detailed in considerably lesser paragraphs. It’s promising to see a path forward mentioned but I can’t help but wonder why this was published instead of currently acknowledging their failure/circumstances and later on publishing a complete post-mortem after the dust fully settles (i.e. without speculation).
To make sure their stonk doesn’t drop at market open next week. Investors will read this (or get the sound bites) and shrug it off as some vendor issue rather than deep issue that will require months of rework (millions of dollars and thus impacting earnings)
