Aside from the ridiculousness of calling 8th grade algebra "advanced math" (I was taking the equivalent in 6th grade where I grew up, in a low-income public school), "giving directives that schools are not to devote any resources to teaching 8th grade algebra" is in every sense equivalent to "banning teaching algebra."
If a state did the same thing with LGBT topics or evolution, I suspect you'd take no issue with calling it a ban.
> If a state did the same thing with LGBT topics or evolution
Hahaha you mean the topics that are actually getting banned in states like Florida and Kentucky?
> giving directives that schools are not to devote any resources to teaching 8th grade algebra is in every sense equivalent to “banning teaching algebra”
Again, please provide some specific examples of this happening. Are you getting all worked up over something that is mostly made up or taken completely out of context? No way to know unless you cite the actual problem and demonstrate the magnitude of the problem.
Of course there absolutely is a huge difference between not having the resources for a class and banning it by law, and you know it. You can argue the outcomes might be equivalent, if you want, but it undermines your own argument to exaggerate.
Fair enough, I’m not defending SFUSD specifically, I’m arguing from my own experience having seen similar policies made specifically over resource constraints. That text notwithstanding it would still be true that adding options for advanced students does take away resources that could be used for students that are behind, one way or another. It might not be a lot, and it might be reasonable to offer advanced math, but the money is still finite and could be used to further help kids in the most need. In this entire thread we’re still only talking about kids who’ve already met the educational goals, and not talking about how to avoid leaving some kids behind, especially the poorer ones.
Due to polarization. People are herded to fight over stupid but controversial things so things never change. That said, parents in general invest and care a lot about their V2s than any government could ever lie about. Inevitably their children will be indoctrinated to believe in things that go against their values and they will be rightfully pissed off and afraid.
If a state did the same thing with LGBT topics or evolution, I suspect you'd take no issue with calling it a ban.