>I just know more about these things than you seem to do.
No you're being pedantic. I don't think you know more.
Think about it. We both agree math is discovered. So why the hell are we diving into this tangent? It's because you decided to say that logic is made up and then subsequently agree it's not. The nuance of whether and what part of logic is made up is pedantic.
>When I look at the book you cited, it's just full of really simple stuff made really complicated. Pointless, indeed. Personally, I am more interested in the opposite direction. But that's just my personal opinion.
Sure tbh I never fully read the book. Skimmed. Seems to be a good resource for beginners. But I also don't think you're an expert.
Your interested in the opposite? You mean the philosophy of programming? Well good on you. You go study that then. Again I can't understand your genius.
No you're being pedantic. I don't think you know more.
Think about it. We both agree math is discovered. So why the hell are we diving into this tangent? It's because you decided to say that logic is made up and then subsequently agree it's not. The nuance of whether and what part of logic is made up is pedantic.
>When I look at the book you cited, it's just full of really simple stuff made really complicated. Pointless, indeed. Personally, I am more interested in the opposite direction. But that's just my personal opinion.
Sure tbh I never fully read the book. Skimmed. Seems to be a good resource for beginners. But I also don't think you're an expert.
Your interested in the opposite? You mean the philosophy of programming? Well good on you. You go study that then. Again I can't understand your genius.