I'm not the one who seems angry or incoherent here. I did carelessly omit the % on your suggested #, but I think your idea that there are only 300 child porn consumers in the US is laughably detached from reality.
you haven't addressed a single argument i made in the first post, they were all very simple too, they should be immediately rebukeable if they were wrong
what % of those "child porn consumers" actually just looked at a picture of a naked 16 year old girl? answer that and stay fashionable.
