What specifically about that section did you want to share? Based on what I've read, the only defense is basically "she never said she was going to help people so you can't be mad".

That short section of a wikipedia article could not be described as a comprehensive defence against the detailed criticisms levelled at her, especially those from Hitch.

I have seen an attempted rebuttal around her behaviour, specifically responding to that book, but I suspect that piece was more an apologetic than an objective defence.