Jerry Pournelle had absolutely no right or entitlement to use the ARPANET or MIT-AI lab's computers, and he was a drunken parasite making belligerent threats, breaking the MIT-AI Lab's rules, and violating DOD policies.
The resources he was abusing were not publically available at any price, commercial use of the ARPANET was officially banned, and he had no right to use it, while he was personally and commercially benefiting from the MIT-AI Lab's generosity, which he scorned in public.
He blatantly violated both the word and spirit of the MIT-AI Lab Tourist Policy, as well as ARPANET and DOD policies against commercial use:
>Unfortunately, we must reserve the right to terminate tourist accounts for any reason, although we hope this will not be necessary. The most likely reason would be if a tourist or tourists were to interfere with the laboratories’ research objectives, i.e. do not interfere with other people who are using the system.
>The ITS computers are not an infinite resource and we must establish priorities for their use. Their primary purpose is to support faculty, staff and students in their endeavor to carry out MIT’s Sponsored Research. While tourists are expected to contribute to MIT’s research objectives, they are unlikely to be in the mainstream of the on-going work and should therefore consider their role and use of the MIT ITS machine a privilege. A tourist should at all times conduct himself or herself with this in mind. The most important principle is that tourists should not interfere in any way with a laboratory member’s use of the machine. This means that a tourist should not do anything which annoys other users, and also that he should not use the computer resources when a laboratory member needs them.
>[...] Any use of the MIT ITS machines for personal gain, profit making enterprise, or political purposes is not a legitimate use of the Laboratories’ computer resources.
>These specific statements of policy give a minimum of how a tourist ought to behave to be a responsible user on the MIT ITS system. They are not a complete list of all the ways tourists should or should not behave. Just because some particular anti-social behavior is not listed does not mean that it is acceptable. What a tourist should do is cultivate a good attitude: make a positive effort to anticipate and avoid actions that would interfere with other users. If you cannot tell whether a certain course of action can interfere with any one, find out from someone else before trying it.
>It is considered illegal to use the ARPANet for anything which is not in direct support of Government business ... personal messages to other ARPANet subscribers (for example, to arrange a get-together or check and say a friendly hello) are generally not considered harmful ... Sending electronic mail over the ARPANet for commercial profit or political purposes is both anti-social and illegal. By sending such messages, you can offend many people, and it is possible to get MIT in serious trouble with the Government agencies which manage the ARPANet.
Why are you so butt-hurt on his behalf? What ever happened to personal responsibility, and what's wrong with kicking him off after he broke the rules and violated the law? He not only richly deserved to be ordered off the net, but he also literally demanded it:
"I find this thoroughly distasteful. If you have some authority to order me off the net, do so. If not, leave me alone." -Jerry Pournelle
They certainly DID have some authority to order him off the net, so he got exactly what he demanded and deserved. It was poetic justice, and his sputtering apoplectic reaction threatening to inform the House Armed Services Committee was as priceless as the ARPANET access he lost due to his own asinine words and illegal misbehavior:
"One thing that is known about ARPA: you can be heaved off it for supporting the policies of the Department of Defense. Of course that was intended to anger me. If you have an ARPA account, please tell CSTACY that he was successful; now let us see if my Pentagon friends can upset him. Or perhaps some reporter friends. Or both., Or even the House Armed Services Committee." -Jerry Pournelle
Jerry Pournelle was heaved off the ARPANET for being a flaming alcoholic asshole who shouldn't have had ARPANET access in the first place, because he was abusing it for personal gain and commercial purposes: promoting his SF books and his Byte Magazine column, not for supporting the policies of the Department of Defense!
"Think of it as evolution in action." -Jerry Pournelle
The whole affair was a triumph of Social Darwinism, and couldn't have been more deserved! ;)
I'm glad you hate it so much you'd resort to sarcastic reverse psychology and psychological projection, carrying the water for Jerry Pournelle, instead of having any rational counter argument. Why don't you try telling your friends on the House Armed Services Committee about how I'm abusing the Internet?
The resources he was abusing were not publically available at any price, commercial use of the ARPANET was officially banned, and he had no right to use it, while he was personally and commercially benefiting from the MIT-AI Lab's generosity, which he scorned in public.
He blatantly violated both the word and spirit of the MIT-AI Lab Tourist Policy, as well as ARPANET and DOD policies against commercial use:
https://donhopkins.medium.com/mit-ai-lab-tourist-policy-f73b...
>Unfortunately, we must reserve the right to terminate tourist accounts for any reason, although we hope this will not be necessary. The most likely reason would be if a tourist or tourists were to interfere with the laboratories’ research objectives, i.e. do not interfere with other people who are using the system.
>The ITS computers are not an infinite resource and we must establish priorities for their use. Their primary purpose is to support faculty, staff and students in their endeavor to carry out MIT’s Sponsored Research. While tourists are expected to contribute to MIT’s research objectives, they are unlikely to be in the mainstream of the on-going work and should therefore consider their role and use of the MIT ITS machine a privilege. A tourist should at all times conduct himself or herself with this in mind. The most important principle is that tourists should not interfere in any way with a laboratory member’s use of the machine. This means that a tourist should not do anything which annoys other users, and also that he should not use the computer resources when a laboratory member needs them.
>[...] Any use of the MIT ITS machines for personal gain, profit making enterprise, or political purposes is not a legitimate use of the Laboratories’ computer resources.
>These specific statements of policy give a minimum of how a tourist ought to behave to be a responsible user on the MIT ITS system. They are not a complete list of all the ways tourists should or should not behave. Just because some particular anti-social behavior is not listed does not mean that it is acceptable. What a tourist should do is cultivate a good attitude: make a positive effort to anticipate and avoid actions that would interfere with other users. If you cannot tell whether a certain course of action can interfere with any one, find out from someone else before trying it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARPANET
>A 1982 handbook on computing at MIT's AI Lab stated regarding network etiquette:[92]
https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/41180/AI_WP_2...
>It is considered illegal to use the ARPANet for anything which is not in direct support of Government business ... personal messages to other ARPANet subscribers (for example, to arrange a get-together or check and say a friendly hello) are generally not considered harmful ... Sending electronic mail over the ARPANet for commercial profit or political purposes is both anti-social and illegal. By sending such messages, you can offend many people, and it is possible to get MIT in serious trouble with the Government agencies which manage the ARPANet.
Why are you so butt-hurt on his behalf? What ever happened to personal responsibility, and what's wrong with kicking him off after he broke the rules and violated the law? He not only richly deserved to be ordered off the net, but he also literally demanded it:
"I find this thoroughly distasteful. If you have some authority to order me off the net, do so. If not, leave me alone." -Jerry Pournelle
They certainly DID have some authority to order him off the net, so he got exactly what he demanded and deserved. It was poetic justice, and his sputtering apoplectic reaction threatening to inform the House Armed Services Committee was as priceless as the ARPANET access he lost due to his own asinine words and illegal misbehavior:
"One thing that is known about ARPA: you can be heaved off it for supporting the policies of the Department of Defense. Of course that was intended to anger me. If you have an ARPA account, please tell CSTACY that he was successful; now let us see if my Pentagon friends can upset him. Or perhaps some reporter friends. Or both., Or even the House Armed Services Committee." -Jerry Pournelle
Jerry Pournelle was heaved off the ARPANET for being a flaming alcoholic asshole who shouldn't have had ARPANET access in the first place, because he was abusing it for personal gain and commercial purposes: promoting his SF books and his Byte Magazine column, not for supporting the policies of the Department of Defense!
"Think of it as evolution in action." -Jerry Pournelle
The whole affair was a triumph of Social Darwinism, and couldn't have been more deserved! ;)